By Donna Nuernberg, Manager of Accounting and Consulting Services
An IRS Revenue Ruling went into effect on July 1, 2015, that could cost your company a penalty of $100 per day, per employee, up to $500,000. Under Internal Revenue Code § 4980D, the penalty could be $36,500 per year per employee for employers that do not offer insurance coverage but instead seek to reimburse their employees for insurance purchased on the individual market. If you’re not in compliance, this penalty could put you out of business.
Many small employers with fewer than 50 employees think that nothing in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will impact them. However, this penalty can be assessed to employers with as few as two employees. Many small employers have used payment arrangements such as reimbursing the employee for premiums or making the payment directly to the insurance company to help employees obtain health coverage without the trouble and cost of providing a full-fledged company group health insurance plan.
Some employers have done this because they could not obtain an affordable group policy, or they may not have enough employees to meet the insurance companies’ criteria. According to the IRS, this penalty can be assessed to employers for simply offering plans that reimburse employees for premiums paid by them for individual health insurance policies. The penalty may also apply to direct employer payments of premiums for employees’ individual health policies (Jerry Love, 2016).
Unlike early reports stating the ACA would only affect larger companies, this penalty applies to any company that reimburses more than one employee.
This penalty is huge. It is more than 18 times greater than the $2,000 employer-mandate penalty under ACA for not providing qualifying health insurance for employees. It is very important to note that employers with fewer than 50 workers are not exempt.
There are a few exceptions to this penalty, but caution should be taken. The penalty will not apply if only one employee is recompensed for individual health insurance and/or other medical expenses.
Shareholders of sub S Corporation exception
“IRS Notice 2015-17 also clarified that S corporations may continue to report reimbursements of health insurance of 2% (or greater) shareholders pursuant to Notice 2008-1. Until further guidance is issued the excise tax under Internal Revenue Code § 4980D will not be asserted for any failure to satisfy the market reforms by a 2% shareholder-employee healthcare arrangement.” (Jerry Love, 2016)
Clearly, ACA was written with the intention of helping everyone in America obtain health insurance. Further, the ACA has a clear mandate to the larger employers (those with more than 50 full time employees) to provide affordable health insurance to all of their full-time employees. According to the IRS and Department of Labor, these individual market policies cannot be integrated to meet the market reform provisions. Specifically, the IRS stated these plans violate the Essential Health Benefits provision of the ACA, as well as the prohibition on spending caps on these mandatory benefits.
There are options if you think you fall into the above situation.
Jerry Love, C. C. (2016, January 27). Will Your Clients Run Afoul of ACA’s Largest Penalty? Retrieved from CPA Tax Magazine: http://www.cpataxmag.net/news-front-page-featured-articles/1394-will-your-clients-run-afoul-of-aca-s-largest-penalty
Seek the services of a legal or tax adviser before implementing any ideas contained in this blog. To reach a financial advisor at Lane Gorman Trubitt PLLC, call (214) 871-7500 or email firstname.lastname@example.org.